further work on methodology

This commit is contained in:
2025-07-15 17:20:21 +02:00
parent ee8b4456d8
commit 09b77a82f7
+7 -2
View File
@@ -501,8 +501,10 @@ Note that convolutional models do not require an explicit resampling parameter,
(see Section~\ref{subsubsec:temporal_convolution_layer}).
\paragraph{Model Parameter Tuning}
To identify the most suitable configuration for each model architecture, model-specific hyperparameters were tuned for optimal predictive performance.
The goal was to balance model complexity and expressiveness in relation to the given input configuration.
To identify suitable configurations for each model architecture, model-specific hyperparameters were tuned with the goal of optimizing predictive performance.
The selected value ranges were intentionally broad to explore the trade-off between model complexity and generalization.
This allowed assessment of whether increased architectural depth and capacity contribute meaningfully to performance,
or whether simpler models are sufficient for the task.
\begin{table}[htbp]
\centering
@@ -555,6 +557,9 @@ joint parameter space in a more efficient and principled manner.
\subsection{Evaluation}\label{subsec:evaluation}
A variety of evaluation metrics have been defined, to best capture each aspect of the performance of an ovulation prediction.
The evaluation is divided into two subgroups for the two prediction targets, fertility and past-ovulation indicator.
\subsubsection{Evaluation Metrics}\label{subsubsec:evaluation_metrics}
\subsubsection{Baseline Comparisons}\label{subsubsec:baseline_comparisons}