further work on introduction
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
% Preamble
|
||||
\documentclass[a4paper, 12pt]{article}
|
||||
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
||||
|
||||
% Packages
|
||||
\usepackage{amsmath}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,26 +4,23 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Introduction}\label{sec:introduction}
|
||||
|
||||
In textbooks, a menstrual cycle is 28 to 30 days in length with its ovulation happening around day 14~\cite{Phy}
|
||||
While textbooks often describe a menstrual cycle as lasting 28 to 30 days with ovulation around day 14~\cite{owen_physiology_nodate},
|
||||
such regularity is the exception rather than the rule~\cite{munster_length_1992, bull_real-world_2019}.
|
||||
For individuals with consistent cycle patterns, simple calendar-based predictions may suffice.
|
||||
However, for the majority, especially with increasing age and associated irregularity, more sophisticated methods are necessary.
|
||||
This, combined with an ever higher age of pregnancy in industrialized and industrializing countries,
|
||||
underscores the growing need for accurate understanding of the menstrual cycle~\cite{sauer_reproduction_2015}.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The average age of pregnant women in developed countries has been increasing over the past few decades.
|
||||
Combined with the sharp decline in conception rates after age 35,
|
||||
this trend underscores the growing need for accurate understanding of the menstrual cycle~\cite{sauer_reproduction_2015}.
|
||||
Predicting the fertile days in a women's menstrual cycle is not only relevant for family planning but also for
|
||||
natural contraception and general health monitoring, as the corresponding hormone levels have a significant impact on
|
||||
the overall health and well-being of a woman.
|
||||
|
||||
Textbook cycles usually have a length of 28 days with an ovulation around day 14.
|
||||
This however, does not represent the real world variability of menstrual cycles.
|
||||
For many women, the practical use cases of menstrual cycle monitoring are \emph{Natural Family Planning} (NFP) and contraception~\cite{earle_use_2021}.
|
||||
For these use cases, it is essential to identify the ovulation and its corresponding fertile and infertile days in a cycle,
|
||||
to either avoid or achieve pregnancy more effectively.
|
||||
|
||||
Ovulation is the process in which an egg cell is released from the ovaries, making fertilization possible.
|
||||
This process is regulated by hormonal changes, including fluctuations in luteinizing hormone (LH) and
|
||||
follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and is accompanied by other physiological changes such as an increase in electrical resistance
|
||||
and viscosity of the cervical mucus or an increase in body temperature~\cite{wallach_prediction_1980}.
|
||||
These processes remain incompletely understood and are influenced by lifestyle factors such as stress, diet or exercise or
|
||||
health-related factors such as Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), making ovulation difficult to predict.
|
||||
These processes remain incompletely understood and are influenced by lifestyle factors such as stress, diet, exercise,
|
||||
or health-related conditions such as Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), making ovulation difficult to predict.
|
||||
|
||||
In theory, these physiological changes provide a basis for predicting ovulation and the surrounding fertile window.
|
||||
In practice, however, many of these signals are difficult to measure continuously, as they require invasive procedures,
|
||||
@@ -35,7 +32,7 @@ others suggest its predictive value for ovulation~\cite{sato_novel_2024, royston
|
||||
|
||||
However, most existing studies rely on small, idealized datasets that exclude cycles with irregular lengths or late ovulation.
|
||||
While such restrictions simplify the prediction task and yield high accuracy, they give a misleading impression of real-world model performance.
|
||||
It is thus not yet fully clear, whether temperature can reliably be used as a predictive marker for ovulation or fertility.
|
||||
It is thus not yet fully clear whether temperature can reliably be used as a predictive marker for ovulation or fertility.
|
||||
|
||||
Additionally, other studies have focused on peripheral temperature measurements of skin or in-ear temperature,
|
||||
which are subject to many sources of noise that can significantly affect the quality of the resulting predictions.
|
||||
@@ -43,24 +40,19 @@ Intravaginal temperature reflects true core body temperature and offers higher r
|
||||
as it is largely unaffected by external circumstances.
|
||||
This allows for more reliable detection of subtle thermal shifts associated with ovulation, especially in irregular cycles.
|
||||
|
||||
Generalization is critical for reliable ovulation prediction,
|
||||
especially given the high variability in cycle patterns~\cite{munster_length_1992, bull_real-world_2019}.
|
||||
This is particularly relevant in high-stakes applications such as natural contraception or in-vitro fertilization (IVF),
|
||||
where inaccurate predictions can have serious consequences.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
This study aims to advance ovulation prediction by leveraging an extensive database of more than 40,000 menstrual cycles recorded using
|
||||
an intravaginal wearable device that continuously measures core body temperature.
|
||||
This study aims to advance fertility prediction by leveraging an extensive database of more than 40,000 menstrual cycles,
|
||||
covering cycle lengths 11 to 149 days and ovulation days ranging from 7 to 136, recorded using
|
||||
an intravaginal wearable device that continuously measures core body temperature at a resolution of 288 measurements per day.
|
||||
The objective is to develop a machine learning model that performs reliably across diverse cycle types, including irregular ones.
|
||||
To this end, we compare a set of time series-based machine learning architectures and evaluate their performance for
|
||||
natural family planning and contraception.
|
||||
NFP and contraception.
|
||||
Finally, we demonstrate that high predictive accuracy on highly regular, curated datasets, as commonly reported in prior work,
|
||||
does not reflect general applicability, since such datasets tend to favor even simple, rule-based approaches.
|
||||
may overestimate real-world applicability, since such datasets tend to favor even simple, rule-based approaches.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The research objectives are:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item To evaluate the predictive value of body temperature for ovulation and fertility across diverse menstrual cycle types.
|
||||
\item To assess the performance of different model architectures on the use cases of natural family planning and contraception, across both regular and irregular cycles.
|
||||
\item To compare sophisticated machine learning models with simple rule-based baseline approaches.
|
||||
\item To study the overall predictive quality of temperature for ovulation and fertility prediction.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user