rework of results section
This commit is contained in:
@@ -703,6 +703,11 @@ but the Fertility-Overall MSE was only marginally better for a shorter window, w
|
||||
This selection process was applied to all tested parameters—input window length, input resolution, and model complexity.
|
||||
The resulting configurations were then used in the irregular cycles study and the use case evaluation.
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Uncertainty estimation.}
|
||||
We report point estimates on a held-out test set.
|
||||
Because per-user (or per-cycle/day) predictions were not retained, we cannot compute confidence intervals or paired significance tests.
|
||||
All model comparisons are therefore descriptive rather than inferential.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Regular and Irregular Cycles}\label{subsubsec:methodology_regular_and_irregular_cycles}
|
||||
|
||||
A perfectly regular menstrual pattern does not require a sophisticated algorithm to predict ovulation—
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user