alex/temperature-based-fertility-prediction-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

started methodology

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Alex Blank
2025-07-02 16:09:56 +02:00
parent c8cfb7610c
commit 584fb15951
4 changed files with 1635 additions and 1570 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
thesis/sections/related_work.tex
+42 -12
View File
@@ -5,13 +5,28 @@
\section{Related Work}\label{sec:related_work}
There has been a variety of works in menstrual cycle analysis.
\subsection{Body Temperature}
\subsection{Temperature-Based Approaches}\label{subsec:temperature_based_approaches}
\citeauthor{luo_detection_2020} used an in-ear wearable device that measured ear canal temperature every five minutes during sleep~\cite{luo_detection_2020}.
Several studies have questioned the utility of BBT (Basal Body Temperature) for reliable ovulation prediction.
For example \citeauthor{bauman_basal_1981} concluded, that BBT is not a robust standalone marker due to its
retrospective nature and sensitivity to external factors and thus must be used with extreme caution clinical or research evaluations~\cite{bauman_basal_1981}.
However, such conclusions were largely based on the standard BBT method, which relies on a single-point measurement taken
immediately upon waking—typically reflecting the body's lowest resting temperature.
In contrast, this study, along with several recent works, leverages continuous or high-resolution temperature data collected during sleep or throughout the day.
This richer signal provides a more robust foundation for detecting ovulatory patterns and addresses many of the limitations historically associated with BBT-based methods.
This was further supported by a study from \citeauthor{zhu_accuracy_2021}, who compared the accuracy and sensitivity of traditional BBT measurements with continuous skin temperature recordings from a wrist-worn device~\cite{zhu_accuracy_2021}.
They found that continuous temperature measurements had significantly higher sensitivity in detecting ovulation, though at the cost of increased false positives and lower specificity.
Importantly, the continuous data showed a greater average temperature difference between the follicular and luteal phases.
The authors conclude that for women seeking to optimize their chances of conception, continuous temperature tracking offers measurable benefits—primarily due to improved phase delineation enabled by the richer signal.
The predictive value of continuous temperature data was further demonstrated in a study by \citeauthor{luo_detection_2020},
who used an in-ear wearable device that measured ear canal temperature every five minutes during sleep~\cite{luo_detection_2020}.
They trained a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) to classify each data point into either a high- or low-temperature state,
augmented with biorhythm information from the user.
After filtering, the final dataset consisted of 64 cycles, each with at least 40\% data availability and at least one self-reported ovulation day, as determined by a hormone test kit.
After filtering, the final dataset consisted of 65 cycles, each with at least 40\% data availability and at least one self-reported ovulation day, as determined by a hormone test kit.
However, no information was provided regarding the distribution of cycle lengths or ovulation timing.
Ovulation detection was considered successful if the predicted day fell within ±3 days of the self-reported value.
@@ -37,16 +52,28 @@ For menstruation prediction, the model detected 70.70\% of menstruation days in
These results indicate that the model performs reasonably well for individuals with regular cycles,
but struggles significantly in the presence of menstrual irregularity—particularly in detecting the fertile window.
In addition to academic research, several commercial products use temperature-based methods for fertility tracking,
such as \textit{Ava}~\cite{sl_ava_nodate}, \textit{Daysy}~\cite{electronics_zykluscomputer_nodate} or \textit{Trackle}~\cite{noauthor_trackle_nodate}.
However, these products typically rely on proprietary algorithms, and no peer-reviewed publications are available detailing their methodology or performance.
This lack of transparency limits their scientific evaluation and comparability.
In contrast, the present study provides an open and data-driven approach to ovulation prediction based on continuous temperature data, aiming to contribute reproducible evidence to the field.
Several studies have questioned the utility of BBT (Basal Body Temperature) for reliable ovulation prediction.
For example \citeauthor{bauman_basal_1981} concluded, that BBT is not a robust standalone marker due to its
retrospective nature and sensitivity to external factors and thus must be used with extreme caution clinical or research evaluations~\cite{bauman_basal_1981}
\subsection{Alternative Pyhysiological Signals}
\subsection{Other Physiological Signals}\label{subsec:other_physiolocical_signals}
In addition to temperature, other physiological signals have been explored for ovulation and cycle phase prediction.
For example,\citeauthor{masuda_machine_2025} developed a machine learning algorithm to classify phases of the menstrual cycle
As early as \citeyear{moreno_temporal_1988}, researchers investigated ovulation prediction based on the electrical resistance of salivary and vaginal secretions~\cite{moreno_temporal_1988}.
Their study analyzed 29 cycles from 11 women, with daily recordings of BBT, urinary LH, pelvic ultrasound, and ovulation predictor kit results.
Participants were under the age of 35, had cycle lengths between 25 and 35 days, and had abstained from hormone therapies for at least two months prior to the study.
The results showed that, in all but one cycle, peaks in salivary resistance occurred 5–11 days prior to the estimated ovulation day.
The nadir in vaginal resistance coincided with or occurred on the day of ovulation.
These findings suggest that electrical resistance is a strong physiological marker for predicting ovulation.
A related modern implementation is the commercial product \textit{kegg}~\cite{noauthor_kegg_nodate}, which measures the electrical resistance of cervical mucus.
The device uses an undisclosed algorithm to estimate fertility status based on these readings, although no peer-reviewed validation studies are currently available.
\citeauthor{masuda_machine_2025} developed a machine learning algorithm to classify phases of the menstrual cycle
(follicular vs. luteal) based on sleeping heart rate, as recorded by a fitness tracker~\cite{masuda_machine_2025}.
They used an XGBoost classifier for this binary task and additionally performed ovulation day prediction,
although the details of this task were not fully specified.
@@ -76,5 +103,8 @@ Ovulation day prediction yielded an average absolute error between 3.6 and 4.1 d
When models are trained on highly constrained datasets with predictable patterns and clear ovulatory signals,
complex methods often show limited gains over naive or rule-based approaches—as will be demonstrated in Section~\ref{sec:methodology}.
%parts: traditional methods, ml approaches, tft in medical time series or other time series
\paragraph{Summary:}
While various physiological signals and modeling strategies have been explored for ovulation prediction,
many existing studies are limited by small, highly selected datasets, assumptions of cycle regularity, or reliance on proprietary algorithms.
The present work extends prior approaches by leveraging a large, heterogeneous dataset of real-world cycles and applying transparent,
data-driven modeling to better capture individual variability.