further work on introduction
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,8 +1,17 @@
|
||||
%! Author = alex
|
||||
%! Date = 3/6/25
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Discussion}\label{sec:discussion}
|
||||
|
||||
In this study, we investigated the performance of different machine learning architectures on the task of fertility prediction,
|
||||
with the aim to find a model that performs well for natural family planning and natural contraception on regular and irregular cycles.
|
||||
|
||||
Our goal was to
|
||||
|
||||
Based on an extensive real-world database and established model architectures for timeseries analysis,
|
||||
we expect to outperform both rule-based baselines and related studies.
|
||||
We think, that for regular cycles, the performance difference will be lower than
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% talk about whether bbt / temperature can be used for such a task, discuss bbt doubt papers
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user