further work on introduction

thesis/sections/results.tex

@@ -25,6 +25,32 @@ allowing for a nuanced comparison of approaches and their practical relevance to
 
 \subsection{Fertility Probability Prediction Accuracy}\label{subsec:fertility_probability_precition_accuracy}
 
+\begin{landscape}
+    \begin{table}[ht]
+        \centering
+        \caption{Model comparison for fertility prediction using MAE and MSE}
+        \begin{adjustbox}{max width=\linewidth}
+            \begin{tabular}{lllcccccc}
+                \toprule
+                \textbf{Model} & \textbf{Window} & \textbf{Daily} &
+                \textbf{MAE$_{fert}$} & \textbf{MAE$_{fert,during}$} & \textbf{MAE$_{fert,non}$} &
+                \textbf{MSE$_{fert}$} & \textbf{MSE$_{fert,during}$} & \textbf{MSE$_{fert,non}$} \\
+                \midrule
+                ModelA & 7  & Yes & 0.67 & 0.59 & 0.73 & 0.89 & 0.82 & 0.95 \\
+                ModelB & 14 & No  & 0.65 & 0.58 & 0.71 & 0.87 & 0.80 & 0.93 \\
+% More rows...
+                \bottomrule
+            \end{tabular}
+        \end{adjustbox}
+        \label{tab:fertility_comparison}
+    \end{table}
+\end{landscape}
+
+
+
+% show why I selected the individual input configs for model config training
+% selected by best mse fertility, use 2nd best, as it provides basically the same performance, but more input data for more complex model configs
+
 \subsubsection{Performance Across Fertile Window}\label{subsubsec:fert_performance_across_fertile_window}
 
 \subsubsection{Impact of Input Resolution}\label{subsubsec:fert_impact_of_input_resolution}
@@ -56,6 +82,4 @@ allowing for a nuanced comparison of approaches and their practical relevance to
 \subsubsection{Pregnancy Use-Case Results}\label{subsubsec:use_case_pregnancy_results}
 
 
-% show, that past cycles might not directly be included but are indirectly included by the static features
-
 \subsection{Summary of Key Findings}\label{subsec:summary_of_key_findings}