hopefully final commit

This commit is contained in:
Alex Blank
2025-09-05 20:02:41 +00:00
parent a2fdf2f0a3
commit bf2e79cc4c
15 changed files with 709 additions and 449 deletions
+24 -7
View File
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ In~\citeyear{wallach_prediction_1980}, \citeauthor{wallach_prediction_1980} iden
including salivary ferning and viscosity, serum levels of progesterone and estrogen,
and urinary luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations~\cite{wallach_prediction_1980}.
These indicators showed strong correlation with ovulation timing as measured via transvaginal ultrasound.
\citeauthor{noauthor_monitoring_1987} later expanded on this work by focusing specifically on LH and estradiol,
confirming that LH surges reliably indicate an imminent ovulation event.
\citeauthor{vermesh_monitoring_1987} later expanded on this work by focusing specifically on LH and estradiol,
confirming that LH surges reliably indicate an imminent ovulation event~\cite{vermesh_monitoring_1987}.
Despite their diagnostic value, many of these biomarkers are difficult to measure continuously and reliably in everyday settings,
limiting their practicality for real-time or large-scale applications.
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ However, several studies have raised concerns about its reliability as a predict
high susceptibility to external confounders, recommending caution in its clinical or research use~\cite{bauman_basal_1981}.
Similarly, \citeauthor{moghissi_accuracy_1976} emphasized its limited accuracy, particularly in cycles with irregularities~\cite{moghissi_accuracy_1976}.
However, such conclusions were largely based on the standard BBT method, which relies on a single-point measurement taken
Such conclusions were largely based on the standard BBT method, which relies on a single-point measurement taken
immediately upon waking—typically reflecting the body's lowest resting temperature.
In contrast, this study, along with several recent works, leverages continuous or high-resolution temperature data collected during sleep or throughout the day.
This richer signal provides a more robust foundation for detecting ovulatory patterns and addresses many of the limitations historically associated with BBT-based methods.
@@ -78,10 +78,27 @@ For menstruation prediction, the model detected 70.70\% of menstruation days in
These results indicate that the model performed well in regular cycles but struggled with irregularity, particularly in detecting the fertile window.
Complementing academic efforts, several commercial products have adopted temperature-based tracking,
such as \textit{Ava}~\cite{sl_ava_nodate}, \textit{Daysy}~\cite{electronics_zykluscomputer_nodate}, \textit{Trackle}~\cite{noauthor_trackle_nodate}
or \textit{Natural Cycles}~\cite{noauthor_natural_nodate}.
However, these products typically rely on proprietary algorithms, and no peer-reviewed publications are available detailing their methodology or performance.
In~\citeyear{kilungeja_machine_2025},~\citeauthor{kilungeja_machine_2025} trained a set of classification models
to predict the cycle phase a day based on skin temperature, electrodermal activity, interbeat interval and heart rate.
The measurements were automatic and did not require manual participant input~\cite{kilungeja_machine_2025}.
The classification was either into three or four targets: period, ovulation, luteal phase, and follicular phase for the four-class models.
Their dataset included 65 cycles across 18 subjects.
They trained a decision tree, random forest ensemble, logistic regression and support vector machine to enable
an architectural comparison.
Results show an edge for the random forest model with a reported 87\% accuracy and AUC-ROC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve)
of 0.96 for the three class approach.
The four class approach significantly reduced accuracy to 68\% and AUC-ROC of 0.77.
There was no separation into cycle groups and all cycles were in a regular group, with a mean lengths of 28 days (SD: 1.65).
There are some additional studies based on commercial products, such as \emph{Oura Ring}\cite{thigpen_oura_2025}
or \emph{Natural Cycles}\cite{bull_real-world_2019} that work with temperature data as a base.
However, they all focus on retrospective ovulation-detection and often complement this with advice to remain
abstinent during the first cycle phase until the ovulation was reliably detected.
This way they can offer a contraceptive product option, without needing to create a predictive model or algorithm.
Complementing academic efforts, several other commercial products have also adopted temperature-based tracking,
such as \textit{Ava}~\cite{sl_ava_nodate}, \textit{Daysy}~\cite{electronics_zykluscomputer_nodate} or \textit{Trackle}~\cite{noauthor_trackle_nodate}.
However, these products rely on proprietary algorithms, and no peer-reviewed publications are available detailing their methodology or performance.
This lack of transparency limits their scientific evaluation and comparability.
In contrast, the present study provides an open and data-driven approach to ovulation prediction based on continuous temperature data, aiming to contribute reproducible evidence to the field.