further work on results

This commit is contained in:
2025-08-13 15:55:43 +02:00
parent f9b1b63a12
commit bfb8c782ee
6 changed files with 180 additions and 62 deletions
+4 -4
View File
@@ -136,10 +136,10 @@ For women aiming to avoid pregnancy, minimizing false-negative predictions is cr
Although false-positives may lead to unnecessary abstinence, this outcome is generally considered less severe.
Consequently, prediction algorithms should be conservative, erring on the side of higher fertility estimates to prioritize safety.
Conversely, for women aiming to conceive, false-positive predictions could misdirect efforts toward incorrect cycle days,
causing frustration or delays.
False-negatives have fewer negative consequences.
Therefore, algorithms for this group should prefer cautious fertility estimates, reducing the risk of misdirected effort.
For women aiming to conceive, incorrect predictions are less severe, as they might, at worst, result in misdirected
pregnancy effort, causing frustration or delays, but no potential dangers to the health of a woman.
Therefore, algorithms for this group don't need to be as conservative.
It remains to be seen, where the middle ground lies and how different algorithms perform for different use cases.
\subsubsection{Physiological Signs of Ovulation}\label{subsubsec:physiological_signs}
Several physiological signs correlate with ovulation and can be used for prediction.