Files
headquarter/AGENTS.md
T
Fusion 75657bbcb0 docs: add git workflow and auto-commit rules to AGENTS.md
Add section documenting:
- Auto-commit on OpenSpec completion
- Conventional commit format requirements
- Commit scope rules
- Integration with definition of done
2026-05-17 23:18:10 +02:00

129 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown

# AGENTS.md
## Core rule
OpenSpec is the source of truth. Superpowers is the default workflow. Keep changes small, scoped, and verified.
## Priority order
1. Current user instruction
2. OpenSpec proposal, tasks, and spec deltas
3. This `AGENTS.md`
4. Existing project conventions
5. Agent assumptions
When instructions conflict, follow the higher-priority source. Do not silently expand scope.
## Default workflow
For any non-trivial change:
1. Read the relevant OpenSpec change, tasks, and spec deltas.
2. Use `brainstorming` if scope, design, or requirements are unclear.
3. Use `writing-plans` before implementation.
4. Implement only the selected task or clearly requested change.
5. Use tests, typecheck, lint, or targeted checks to verify.
6. Use `verification-before-completion` before claiming completion.
If namespacing is required, use:
* `superpowers:brainstorming`
* `superpowers:writing-plans`
* `superpowers:test-driven-development`
* `superpowers:systematic-debugging`
* `superpowers:verification-before-completion`
## When OpenSpec is required
Create or update an OpenSpec change before implementing:
* New features
* Behavior changes
* API changes
* Database/schema changes
* Auth, security, billing, permissions, or data handling changes
* Architecture changes
* Large refactors
* Anything with unclear acceptance criteria
Small local fixes may skip OpenSpec if they do not change behavior or public contracts.
## Superpowers usage
Use:
* `brainstorming` for ambiguity, design choices, or scope questions.
* `writing-plans` for multi-step or multi-file work.
* `test-driven-development` for behavior changes and bug fixes where practical.
* `systematic-debugging` for failing tests or unclear bugs.
* `verification-before-completion` before final completion claims.
* `using-git-worktrees` only for isolated risky or parallel work.
* `dispatching-parallel-agents` only for independent subtasks with clear boundaries.
If a skill is unavailable, follow its intent manually and say so.
## Scope discipline
Do not:
* Implement outside the selected OpenSpec task.
* Mix unrelated cleanup with feature work.
* Introduce new dependencies without clear justification.
* Treat existing code as more authoritative than OpenSpec for intended behavior.
* Decide product behavior silently when the spec is unclear.
If scope must change, propose an OpenSpec update first.
## Verification
Before completion, report:
* What changed
* Which OpenSpec task/change it addresses
* Tests/checks run
* Any failures, skipped checks, assumptions, or risks
Do not claim completion without verification evidence.
## Git workflow
### Auto-commit on spec completion
When an OpenSpec change is fully implemented and all tasks are complete:
1. Stage all changes with `git add -A`
2. Create a commit with a proper conventional commit message
3. The commit message should:
- Use conventional commit format (`feat:`, `fix:`, `refactor:`, etc.)
- Reference the OpenSpec change name and relevant user stories
- Include a brief summary of what changed
- Mention quality gate results (tests passed, etc.)
- Example:
```
feat: implement user profile management
- Add authenticated profile endpoints (GET/PUT /users/me)
- Add avatar upload with file validation
- Create frontend profile page
Quality gates: pytest (50 passed), ruff, mypy
```
### Commit scope
- One commit per completed OpenSpec change (or related group of changes)
- Do not commit untested or broken code
- Do not commit secrets, .env files, or credentials
## Definition of done
A task is done when:
* It matches OpenSpec.
* The diff is focused.
* Relevant tests/checks passed or limitations are stated.
* No unrelated scope was added.
* Remaining risks or follow-ups are documented.
* Changes are committed with a proper conventional commit message.