Implement layered maps and context retrieval
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
|
||||
# Proposal: Map Context Retrieval
|
||||
|
||||
## Status
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Phase | **Proposal** |
|
||||
| Based on | Follow-up to `layered-map-protocol` |
|
||||
| Next | Spec |
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
After the layered map protocol lands, the agent will know it should load root protocol + root index first, then route through per-directory indexes and rich maps. But the repo will still lack an ergonomic retrieval primitive that can turn a natural-language task into a compact context bundle.
|
||||
|
||||
Without that helper, the agent still has to manually inspect directory indexes, rank candidate areas, and expand to rich maps/files. That weakens the value of the new routing layer.
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposed change
|
||||
|
||||
Add a retrieval tool and command shape:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
project-map context "<user task>"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The first-class surface should be a Pi tool. CLI support can follow the same shape.
|
||||
|
||||
The retrieval result should return a compact context bundle containing:
|
||||
- relevant indexes,
|
||||
- strongest-match rich maps,
|
||||
- likely source files,
|
||||
- relevant symbols when useful,
|
||||
- short instructions on what to read next.
|
||||
|
||||
This remains a local metadata-driven retrieval feature, not a vector-store or Engram-backed memory system.
|
||||
## In scope
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Add Pi tool support for `project-map context <query>`
|
||||
- [ ] Add CLI support using the same shape after the tool contract is stable
|
||||
- [ ] Rank results using paired index/map metadata from the layered protocol
|
||||
- [ ] Return a compact, markdown-first, agent-friendly context bundle
|
||||
- [ ] Document recommended usage from prompts and docs
|
||||
## Out of scope
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Full semantic search across arbitrary source contents
|
||||
- [ ] Replacing source verification with map-based answers
|
||||
- [ ] Building a heavyweight external indexer or vector database
|
||||
|
||||
## Success criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] A natural-language task can resolve to likely indexes/maps/files/symbols without manual repo scanning
|
||||
- [ ] Output is compact enough to inject directly into the next step
|
||||
- [ ] Retrieval builds on generated paired metadata rather than bypassing it
|
||||
- [ ] The first version is tool-first and markdown-first
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user